Free pdf Heraclitus Seminar (SPEP) – Sharkmotorcyclehelmets.co.uk


In Martin Heidegger And Eugen Fink Conducted An Extraordinary Seminar On The Fragments Of Heraclitus Heraclitus Seminar Records Those Conversations, Documenting The Imaginative And Experimental Character Of The Multiplicity Of Interpretations Offered And Providing An Invaluable Portrait Of Heidegger Involved In Active Discussion And ExplicationHeidegger S Remarks In This Seminar Illuminate His Interpretations Not Only Of Pre Socratic Philosophy, But Also Of Figures Such As Hegel And Holderllin At The Same Time, Heidegger Clarifies Many Late Developments In His Own Understanding Of Truth, Being, And Understanding Heidegger And Fink, Both Deeply Rooted In The Freiburg Phenomenological Tradition, Offer Two Competing Approaches To The Phenomenological Reading Of The Ancient Text A Kind Of Reading That, As Fink Says, Is Not So Much Concerned With The Philological Problematic As With Advancing Into The Matter Itself, That Is, Toward The Matter That Must Have Stood Before Heraclitus S Spiritual View This book contains the proceedings of the 1966 67 seminar on Heraclitus, which was held at the University of Freiburg Initially, the plan was for the seminar to expand over a series of semesters but this was never actualized The reader has the opportunity to witness a live dialogue, conducted mainly by Martin Heidegger and Eugen Fink, one of the most distinguished representatives of Phenomenology, as well as the questions and observations made by the participants of the lectures The chapters of the book are categorized under a specific title, e.g orThe Problem of a Speculative Explication , and a number of fragments corresponds to each one Thus, the reader is allowed to be focused on individual themes of the Heraclitean Cosmology and is not confused in any part of the book I think that this book is mainly addressed to Heraclitus scholars and it is far from being easy, the reader must have an extensive knowledge of the Heraclitean Fragments and their main interpretations as well as being familiar with the characteristic Heideggerian language Nevertheless, it is a vital reading for those who have a special interest in the thought of the Presocratic Philosophers and contemporary speculative philosophy. I liked the fact that Fink starts with 64 and not with 10, Heidegger gets much too abstract at times.The translation isn t the best possible, but originals usually read better, so that s no criticism of Mr Seibert who did a creditable job.Perhaps a link to the actual Fragments would have helped the only typo I ever found in that text is in Frag 10, correct would be.A masterpiece, in brief Very highly recommended. This book is very difficult, and I wouldn t recommend it unless you re familar with Heidegger s other accounts of the presocratic philosophers and also have a good knowledge of Heraclitus Without the latter it would probably be tough to follow the twists and turns of Heidegger and Fink s analysis, since a lot of it uses the Greek But Heraclitus Seminar is a really rewarding text if you can make your way through it I ve read this book twice and would benefit from going through it again I think Fink s proposed reading, of which this book primarily consists, successfully poses a very serious critique of Heidegger s approach to Heraclitus and the presocratics in general A principal difference Fink maintains in his reading is the suggestion that we have no means of understanding Heraclitus with any measure of certainty, not only due to the separation of nearly 3,000 years but also because we are too far removed from the intellectual framework in which Heraclitus thought He wonders whether it makes sense to try and determine what the matter of thought is in Heraclitus, going against the Heideggerian grain of the notion that the matter of thought is in fact present for us even now, and is to be found in what is unspoken by Heraclitus Fink opts to follow the phenomena named in the extant Heraclitean fragments and see what they yield by virtue of their own content.This text definitely is Fink much than Heidegger, although I would say that Heidegger s compliance with Fink in many places suggests he doesn t find the majority of Fink s interpretations to be intrinsically problematic But as described at the beginning of the book and in places throughout, you are getting Fink s Heraclitus his interpretation is driven largely by hen panta idea, with emphasis on the fragments concerned with fire and light whereas Heidegger openly says he reads Heraclitus via logos and aletheia These latter concepts are also the principal topics in Heidegger s 1943 44 Heidegger lectures a completely different text composed long before Heraclitus Seminar.So with these things in mind, this text is quite illuminating if you want an inside look at the nuts and bolts of how Heidegger reads the presocratics in terms of methodology but I m not sure that much of its content is well representative of Heidegger It s unfortunate that his own Heraclitus text from twenty years earlier is still unavailable in English but his short essays which contain the highlights from that text can be found in the Early Greek Thinking volume edited by Krell and Capuzzi.

  • Paperback
  • 171 pages
  • Heraclitus Seminar (SPEP)
  • Martin Heidegger
  • English
  • 15 February 2019
  • 9780810110670

About the Author: Martin Heidegger

Martin Heidegger 1889 1976 was a German philosopher whose work is perhaps most readily associated with phenomenology and existentialism, although his thinking should be identified as part of such philosophical movements only with extreme care and qualification His ideas have exerted a seminal influence on the development of contemporary European philosophy They have also had an impact far beyo